The Fraenkel-carnap Question for Limited Higher-order Languages
نویسندگان
چکیده
In the late 20’s Fraenkel and Carnap raised the question of whether or not all semantically complete finitely axiomatizable theories formulated in the theory of types are categorical. Carnap announced a positive answer to this question. However, that proof was flawed (see Awody and Carus [2001] and Awodey and Reck [2002]). The Fraenkel-Carnap question has been ignored until it was rediscovered by Awodey, Carus and Reck. Scott noticed that the question has a positive answer for theories formulated in those n-order languages (n ≥ 2) whose non-logical vocabulary is empty. It is shown here that this question also has a positive answer when the non-logical vocabulary is non-empty provided it includes only individual constants or monadic predicate constants.
منابع مشابه
Fraenkel–Carnap Questions for Equivalence Relations
An equivalence is a binary relational system A = (A, ρA) where ρA is an equivalence relation on A. A simple expansion of an equivalence is a system of the form (Aa1 an) were A is an equivalence and a1, . . . , an are members of A. It is shown that the Fraenkel–Carnap question when restricted to the class of equivalences or to the class of simple expansions of equivalences has a positive answer:...
متن کاملSecond-order Characterizable Cardinals and Ordinals Second-order Characterizable Cardinals and Ordinals
The notions of finite and infinite second-order characterizability of cardinal and ordinal numbers are developed. Several known results for the case of finite characterizability are extended to infinite characterizability, and investigations of the secondorder theory of ordinals lead to some observations about the Fraenkel-Carnap question for well-orders and about the relationship between ordin...
متن کاملHierarchies Ontological and Ideological
Gödel claimed that Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory is ‘what becomes of the theory of types if certain superfluous restrictions are removed’. The aim of this paper is to develop a clearer understanding of Gödel’s remark, and of the surrounding philosophical terrain. In connection with this, we discuss some technical issues concerning infinitary type theories and the programme of developing the seman...
متن کاملMatti Eklund ON HOW LOGIC BECAME FIRST-ORDER
The logical systems within which Frege, Schröder, Russell, Zermelo and other early mathematical logicians worked were all higher-order. It was not until the 1910s that first-order logic was even distinguished as a subsystem of higher-order logic. As late as in the 1920s, higherorder quantification was still quite generally allowed: in fact, it does not seem as if any major logician, among non-i...
متن کامل- 1 - Carnap and Modern Logic 1 Erich
A distinguishing feature of analytic philosophy, or at least of one central strand in it, is the use of modern logic for the purpose of clarifying and solving philosophical problems. The most prominent figure in this tradition was Bertrand Russell; and second only to Russell was Rudolf Carnap. Directly and strongly influenced by Russell, Carnap passed on this influence to legions of later philo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010